File list
This special page shows all uploaded files.
Date | Name | Thumbnail | Size | Description | Versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
21:11, 18 January 2019 | 2005-ITRC Permeable Reactive Barriers.pdf (file) | ![]() |
1.89 MB | Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council (ITRC), 2005. Permeable Reactive Barriers: Lessons Learned/New Directions. PRB-4. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, Permeable Reactive Barriers Team. | 1 |
16:29, 15 November 2018 | EOS in the subsurface.gif (file) | ![]() |
18.46 MB | 1 | |
21:18, 13 November 2018 | Borden3w2 Fig4.png (file) | ![]() |
28 KB | Figure 4. Effect of volume scaling factor (SFV) and mass scaling factor (SFM) on volume contact efficiency for a moderately heterogeneous aquifer with well spacing approximately equal to row spacing (Borden et al., 2008). | 1 |
21:10, 13 November 2018 | Borden3w2 Fig3.png (file) | ![]() |
329 KB | Figure 3. EVO mixed in field during early pilot test. | 1 |
20:57, 13 November 2018 | Rules of thumb for negatively charged emulsions.PNG (file) | 15 KB | - rapid flocculation 0 mV < zeta potential < -5 mV - incipient instability -10 mV < zeta potential < -30 mV - moderate stability -30 mV < zeta potential < -40 mV - good stability -40 mV < zeta potential < -60 m... | 1 | |
20:09, 13 November 2018 | Borden3w2 Fig2.png (file) | ![]() |
132 KB | Figure 2. animation illustrating oil droplet transport and retention in porous media. | 1 |
20:01, 13 November 2018 | Borden3w2 Fig1.PNG (file) | 210 KB | Figure 1. Photo-micrograph of EVO (0.7 µm median diameter). White scale bar 25 µm. | 1 | |
18:53, 12 November 2018 | 2008-Borden-Development of a design tool for injections.pdf (file) | ![]() |
900 KB | Borden, R.C., Clayton, M., Weispfenning, A.M., Simpkin, T. and Lieberman, M.T., 2008. Development of a Design Tool for Planning Aqueous Amendment Injection Systems. Environmental Security Technology Certification Program, Arlington, Virginia. ESTCP P... | 1 |
18:58, 9 November 2018 | USEPA-2017. How to Evaluate Alternative Cleanup tech for UST Sites.pdf (file) | ![]() |
219 KB | U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2017. How to Evaluate Alternative Cleanup Technologies for Underground Storage Tank Sites: A Guide for Corrective Action Plan Reviewers, Chapter V: Landfarming. , Land and Emergency Management 5401R, EPA 51... | 1 |
18:57, 9 November 2018 | USEPA-2003-Landfarming-OSC-Aerobic Biodegradation of Oily Wastes.pdf (file) | ![]() |
883 KB | U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2003. Aerobic Biodegradation of Oily Wastes: A Field Guidance Book for Federal On-scene Coordinators, Version 1.0, October 2003. Region 6 South Central Response and Prevention Branch | 1 |
18:54, 9 November 2018 | USEPA-2002. Exemption of Oil and Gas exploration and Production Wastes....pdf (file) | ![]() |
1,010 KB | U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2002. Exemption of Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Wastes from Federal Hazardous Waste Regulations. Office of Solid Waste, EPA530-K-01-004. | 1 |
18:51, 9 November 2018 | USEPA-1993. bio using land treatment.pdf (file) | ![]() |
2.01 MB | U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1993. Bioremediation Using the Land Treatment Concept. Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C. | 1 |
18:48, 9 November 2018 | Kamath1w2 Fig9.png (file) | ![]() |
101 KB | Figure 9: Chromatogram Change illustrating a crude oil degradation with initial API gravity > 30 (week 0, 3, 7, and 15) | 1 |
18:47, 9 November 2018 | Kamath1w2 Fig8.png (file) | ![]() |
81 KB | 1 | |
18:45, 9 November 2018 | Kamath1w2 Fig7.PNG (file) | 320 KB | Typical Landfarming Operation | 1 | |
18:44, 9 November 2018 | Kamath1w2 Fig6b.png (file) | ![]() |
22 KB | Chromatogram of weathered crude oil | 1 |
18:43, 9 November 2018 | Kamath1w2 Fig6a.png (file) | ![]() |
30 KB | Figure 6a: Chromatogram of fresh crude oil | 1 |
18:42, 9 November 2018 | Kamath1w2 Fig5.png (file) | ![]() |
15 KB | Figure 5. Correlation between API gravity (specific weight of the crude) and the predicted extent of biodegradation as measured by oil and grease (O&G) (McMillen et al., 2004[5]) | 1 |
18:40, 9 November 2018 | Kamath1w2 Fig4.png (file) | ![]() |
799 KB | Figure 4: Rotovator and Plows to till soils | 1 |
18:39, 9 November 2018 | Kamath1w2 Fig3.png (file) | ![]() |
359 KB | Figure 3: Water truck to ensure optimal moisture content for microbial degradation in soils. | 1 |
18:39, 9 November 2018 | Kamath1w2 Fig2.png (file) | ![]() |
617 KB | Figure 2: Excavator to move soils | 1 |
18:36, 9 November 2018 | Kamath1w2 Fig1.png (file) | ![]() |
318 KB | Figure 1: Soils undergoing treatment at a Landfarming Facility | 1 |
16:35, 19 October 2018 | Borden2w2Fig1.png (file) | ![]() |
1.47 MB | 1 | |
19:15, 17 October 2018 | Borden2w2Fig7.png (file) | ![]() |
35 KB | Figure 7. Required base addition for PRB for different target pH values. | 1 |
19:14, 17 October 2018 | Borden2w2Fig6.png (file) | ![]() |
16 KB | Figure 6. Fraction of H2CO3 not ionized (α) versus pH. | 1 |
19:13, 17 October 2018 | Borden2w2Fig5.png (file) | ![]() |
59 KB | Figure 5. Aquifer buffering capacity (pHBC) from multiple ERD sites | 1 |
19:11, 17 October 2018 | Borden2w2Fig4.png (file) | ![]() |
61 KB | Figure 4. Buffering capacity of aquifer solids from SA-17 and OU-2 measured in DI water<ref name = "Borden2017EVO"/>. The legend shows depth below ground surface in feet for individual samples. | 1 |
19:10, 17 October 2018 | Borden2w2Fig3.png (file) | ![]() |
33 KB | Figure 3. Distribution of H<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>*, HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> and CO<sub>3</sub><sup>2-</sup> as a function of pH. | 1 |
19:07, 17 October 2018 | Borden2w2Fig2.png (file) | ![]() |
20 KB | Figure 2. Cumulative frequency distribution of groundwater pH measurements at site in eastern North Carolina where soil pH is approximately 5. | 1 |
17:14, 20 September 2018 | 2006-USEPA-Wadeable Streams Assessment.pdf (file) | ![]() |
13.43 MB | US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2006. Wadeable Streams Assessment: A Collaborative Survey of the Nation’s Streams. EPA 841-B-06-002. US EPA, Office of Research and Development, Office of Water, Washington DC 2046 | 1 |
18:54, 19 September 2018 | 1999-Barbour-Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers.pdf (file) | ![]() |
3.94 MB | Barbour, M.T., J. Gerritsen, B.D. Snyder, and J.B. Stribling. 1999. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish. Second edition. EPA 841-B-99-02. U.S. Environmental Protection A... | 1 |
15:20, 7 September 2018 | 2006-Solutions-IES-Protocol for Enhanced In Situ Bioremediation.pdf (file) | ![]() |
5.16 MB | Borden, R.C., 2006. Protocol for enhanced in situ bioremediation using emulsified edible oil. Solutions Industrial and Environmental Services, Raleigh, NC. | 1 |
14:23, 7 September 2018 | 2009-Riha-Treatability Study for Edible deployment... SRNL-RP-2009-00539-F.pdf (file) | ![]() |
800 KB | Riha, B.D., Looney, B.B., Noonkester, J.V., Hyde, K. and Solutions, S.R.N., 2009. Treatability Study for Edible Oil Deployment for Enhanced cVOC Attenuation for T-Area, Savannah River Site: Interim Report–Year One. Technical Report SRNL-RP-2009-0053... | 1 |
21:18, 6 September 2018 | 2007-Kovacich-Full-Scale Bioaugmentation to Create a Passive Biobarrier....pdf (file) | ![]() |
189 KB | Kovacich, M.S., Beck, D., Rabideau, T., Pettypiece, K.S., Noel, M., Zack, M.J. and Cannaert, M.T., 2007, May. Full-scale bioaugmentation to create a passive biobarrier to remediate a TCE groundwater plume. In Proceedings: Ninth International In Situ a... | 1 |
15:59, 22 August 2018 | Annable1w2Fig4.PNG (file) | 27 KB | 2 | ||
15:58, 22 August 2018 | Annable1w2Fig3.png (file) | ![]() |
236 KB | 2 | |
15:58, 22 August 2018 | Annable1w2Fig2.png (file) | ![]() |
415 KB | 2 | |
15:58, 22 August 2018 | Annable1w2Fig1.png (file) | ![]() |
55 KB | 2 | |
15:56, 22 August 2018 | Annable1w2Equation9.PNG (file) | 2 KB | 2 | ||
15:56, 22 August 2018 | Annable1w2Equation8.PNG (file) | 2 KB | 2 | ||
15:55, 22 August 2018 | Annable1w2Equation7.PNG (file) | 3 KB | 2 | ||
15:55, 22 August 2018 | Annable1w2Equation6.png (file) | ![]() |
3 KB | 2 | |
15:54, 22 August 2018 | Annable1w2Equation5.PNG (file) | 1 KB | 2 | ||
15:54, 22 August 2018 | Annable1w2Equation4.PNG (file) | 2 KB | 2 | ||
15:53, 22 August 2018 | Annable1w2Equation3.PNG (file) | 2 KB | 2 | ||
15:52, 22 August 2018 | Annable1w2Equation2.PNG (file) | 1 KB | 2 | ||
15:52, 22 August 2018 | Annable1w2Equation1.PNG (file) | 1 KB | 2 | ||
15:40, 22 August 2018 | McGuire1w2Fig4.png (file) | ![]() |
92 KB | 2 | |
15:39, 22 August 2018 | McGuire1w2Fig3.png (file) | ![]() |
59 KB | 2 | |
15:39, 22 August 2018 | McGuire1w2Fig2.png (file) | ![]() |
42 KB | 2 |