File list

Jump to: navigation, search

This special page shows all uploaded files.

File list
 
First pagePrevious pageNext pageLast page
Date Name Thumbnail Size Description Versions
21:11, 18 January 2019 2005-ITRC Permeable Reactive Barriers.pdf (file) 1.89 MB Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council (ITRC), 2005. Permeable Reactive Barriers: Lessons Learned/New Directions. PRB-4. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, Permeable Reactive Barriers Team. 1
16:29, 15 November 2018 EOS in the subsurface.gif (file) 18.46 MB   1
21:18, 13 November 2018 Borden3w2 Fig4.png (file) 28 KB Figure 4. Effect of volume scaling factor (SFV) and mass scaling factor (SFM) on volume contact efficiency for a moderately heterogeneous aquifer with well spacing approximately equal to row spacing (Borden et al., 2008). 1
21:10, 13 November 2018 Borden3w2 Fig3.png (file) 329 KB Figure 3. EVO mixed in field during early pilot test. 1
20:57, 13 November 2018 Rules of thumb for negatively charged emulsions.PNG (file) 15 KB - rapid flocculation 0 mV < zeta potential < -5 mV - incipient instability -10 mV < zeta potential < -30 mV - moderate stability -30 mV < zeta potential < -40 mV - good stability -40 mV < zeta potential < -60 m... 1
20:09, 13 November 2018 Borden3w2 Fig2.png (file) 132 KB Figure 2. animation illustrating oil droplet transport and retention in porous media. 1
20:01, 13 November 2018 Borden3w2 Fig1.PNG (file) 210 KB Figure 1. Photo-micrograph of EVO (0.7 µm median diameter). White scale bar 25 µm. 1
18:53, 12 November 2018 2008-Borden-Development of a design tool for injections.pdf (file) 900 KB Borden, R.C., Clayton, M., Weispfenning, A.M., Simpkin, T. and Lieberman, M.T., 2008. Development of a Design Tool for Planning Aqueous Amendment Injection Systems. Environmental Security Technology Certification Program, Arlington, Virginia. ESTCP P... 1
18:58, 9 November 2018 USEPA-2017. How to Evaluate Alternative Cleanup tech for UST Sites.pdf (file) 219 KB U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2017. How to Evaluate Alternative Cleanup Technologies for Underground Storage Tank Sites: A Guide for Corrective Action Plan Reviewers, Chapter V: Landfarming. , Land and Emergency Management 5401R, EPA 51... 1
18:57, 9 November 2018 USEPA-2003-Landfarming-OSC-Aerobic Biodegradation of Oily Wastes.pdf (file) 883 KB U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2003. Aerobic Biodegradation of Oily Wastes: A Field Guidance Book for Federal On-scene Coordinators, Version 1.0, October 2003. Region 6 South Central Response and Prevention Branch 1
18:54, 9 November 2018 USEPA-2002. Exemption of Oil and Gas exploration and Production Wastes....pdf (file) 1,010 KB U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2002. Exemption of Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Wastes from Federal Hazardous Waste Regulations. Office of Solid Waste, EPA530-K-01-004. 1
18:51, 9 November 2018 USEPA-1993. bio using land treatment.pdf (file) 2.01 MB U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1993. Bioremediation Using the Land Treatment Concept. Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C. 1
18:48, 9 November 2018 Kamath1w2 Fig9.png (file) 101 KB Figure 9: Chromatogram Change illustrating a crude oil degradation with initial API gravity > 30 (week 0, 3, 7, and 15) 1
18:47, 9 November 2018 Kamath1w2 Fig8.png (file) 81 KB   1
18:45, 9 November 2018 Kamath1w2 Fig7.PNG (file) 320 KB Typical Landfarming Operation 1
18:44, 9 November 2018 Kamath1w2 Fig6b.png (file) 22 KB Chromatogram of weathered crude oil 1
18:43, 9 November 2018 Kamath1w2 Fig6a.png (file) 30 KB Figure 6a: Chromatogram of fresh crude oil 1
18:42, 9 November 2018 Kamath1w2 Fig5.png (file) 15 KB Figure 5. Correlation between API gravity (specific weight of the crude) and the predicted extent of biodegradation as measured by oil and grease (O&G) (McMillen et al., 2004[5]) 1
18:40, 9 November 2018 Kamath1w2 Fig4.png (file) 799 KB Figure 4: Rotovator and Plows to till soils 1
18:39, 9 November 2018 Kamath1w2 Fig3.png (file) 359 KB Figure 3: Water truck to ensure optimal moisture content for microbial degradation in soils. 1
18:39, 9 November 2018 Kamath1w2 Fig2.png (file) 617 KB Figure 2: Excavator to move soils 1
18:36, 9 November 2018 Kamath1w2 Fig1.png (file) 318 KB Figure 1: Soils undergoing treatment at a Landfarming Facility 1
16:35, 19 October 2018 Borden2w2Fig1.png (file) 1.47 MB   1
19:15, 17 October 2018 Borden2w2Fig7.png (file) 35 KB Figure 7. Required base addition for PRB for different target pH values. 1
19:14, 17 October 2018 Borden2w2Fig6.png (file) 16 KB Figure 6. Fraction of H2CO3 not ionized (α) versus pH. 1
19:13, 17 October 2018 Borden2w2Fig5.png (file) 59 KB Figure 5. Aquifer buffering capacity (pHBC) from multiple ERD sites 1
19:11, 17 October 2018 Borden2w2Fig4.png (file) 61 KB Figure 4. Buffering capacity of aquifer solids from SA-17 and OU-2 measured in DI water<ref name = "Borden2017EVO"/>. The legend shows depth below ground surface in feet for individual samples. 1
19:10, 17 October 2018 Borden2w2Fig3.png (file) 33 KB Figure 3. Distribution of H<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>*, HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> and CO<sub>3</sub><sup>2-</sup> as a function of pH. 1
19:07, 17 October 2018 Borden2w2Fig2.png (file) 20 KB Figure 2. Cumulative frequency distribution of groundwater pH measurements at site in eastern North Carolina where soil pH is approximately 5. 1
17:14, 20 September 2018 2006-USEPA-Wadeable Streams Assessment.pdf (file) 13.43 MB US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2006. Wadeable Streams Assessment: A Collaborative Survey of the Nation’s Streams. EPA 841-B-06-002. US EPA, Office of Research and Development, Office of Water, Washington DC 2046 1
18:54, 19 September 2018 1999-Barbour-Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers.pdf (file) 3.94 MB Barbour, M.T., J. Gerritsen, B.D. Snyder, and J.B. Stribling. 1999. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish. Second edition. EPA 841-B-99-02. U.S. Environmental Protection A... 1
15:20, 7 September 2018 2006-Solutions-IES-Protocol for Enhanced In Situ Bioremediation.pdf (file) 5.16 MB Borden, R.C., 2006. Protocol for enhanced in situ bioremediation using emulsified edible oil. Solutions Industrial and Environmental Services, Raleigh, NC. 1
14:23, 7 September 2018 2009-Riha-Treatability Study for Edible deployment... SRNL-RP-2009-00539-F.pdf (file) 800 KB Riha, B.D., Looney, B.B., Noonkester, J.V., Hyde, K. and Solutions, S.R.N., 2009. Treatability Study for Edible Oil Deployment for Enhanced cVOC Attenuation for T-Area, Savannah River Site: Interim Report–Year One. Technical Report SRNL-RP-2009-0053... 1
21:18, 6 September 2018 2007-Kovacich-Full-Scale Bioaugmentation to Create a Passive Biobarrier....pdf (file) 189 KB Kovacich, M.S., Beck, D., Rabideau, T., Pettypiece, K.S., Noel, M., Zack, M.J. and Cannaert, M.T., 2007, May. Full-scale bioaugmentation to create a passive biobarrier to remediate a TCE groundwater plume. In Proceedings: Ninth International In Situ a... 1
15:59, 22 August 2018 Annable1w2Fig4.PNG (file) 27 KB   2
15:58, 22 August 2018 Annable1w2Fig3.png (file) 236 KB   2
15:58, 22 August 2018 Annable1w2Fig2.png (file) 415 KB   2
15:58, 22 August 2018 Annable1w2Fig1.png (file) 55 KB   2
15:56, 22 August 2018 Annable1w2Equation9.PNG (file) 2 KB   2
15:56, 22 August 2018 Annable1w2Equation8.PNG (file) 2 KB   2
15:55, 22 August 2018 Annable1w2Equation7.PNG (file) 3 KB   2
15:55, 22 August 2018 Annable1w2Equation6.png (file) 3 KB   2
15:54, 22 August 2018 Annable1w2Equation5.PNG (file) 1 KB   2
15:54, 22 August 2018 Annable1w2Equation4.PNG (file) 2 KB   2
15:53, 22 August 2018 Annable1w2Equation3.PNG (file) 2 KB   2
15:52, 22 August 2018 Annable1w2Equation2.PNG (file) 1 KB   2
15:52, 22 August 2018 Annable1w2Equation1.PNG (file) 1 KB   2
15:40, 22 August 2018 McGuire1w2Fig4.png (file) 92 KB   2
15:39, 22 August 2018 McGuire1w2Fig3.png (file) 59 KB   2
15:39, 22 August 2018 McGuire1w2Fig2.png (file) 42 KB   2
First pagePrevious pageNext pageLast page