File list

Jump to: navigation, search

This special page shows all uploaded files.

File list
 
First pagePrevious pageNext pageLast page
Date Name Thumbnail Size Description Versions
18:56, 15 September 2016 Gerhard Fig1.jpg (file) 5.26 MB Figure 1. Smoldering charcoal example of a flameless, self-sustaining combustion reaction.]] 1
18:46, 15 September 2016 Gerhard Equation 1.JPG (file) 12 KB Figure 1. Smoldering charcoal example of a flameless, self-sustaining combustion reaction. 2
16:00, 15 September 2016 Gerhard Fig9.jpg (file) 3.52 MB Figure 9. Illustration of one design for an ex situ smoldering system. 1
15:58, 15 September 2016 Gerhard Fig8.jpg (file) 5.77 MB Figure 8. Pilot test of ''ex situ'' STAR treatment for coal tar liquid waste intentionally mixed with coarse sand (Switzer et al., 2015). 1
15:55, 15 September 2016 Gerhard Fig7.jpg (file) 4.61 MB Figure 7. Photograph of smoldering remediation full scale site treatment at a former chemical manufacturing facility in the USA. 1
15:53, 15 September 2016 Gerhard Fig6.jpg (file) 3.78 MB Figure 6. Soil cores from before and after an ''in situ'' smoldering remediation pilot test at a coal tar contaminated site. 1
15:50, 15 September 2016 Gerhard Fig4.jpg (file) 2.95 MB Figure 4. Comparison of coal-tar contaminated soil before and after smoldering treatment in the laboratory. 1
19:57, 12 September 2016 Richardson-Article 1-Table 1.JPG (file) 105 KB Table 1. Chemical structures and selected properties of the 16 USEPA priority pollutant PAHs<sup>ab</sup> 1
14:42, 7 September 2016 Newell-Article 1-Equation 1rr.jpg (file) 11 KB Newell-Article 1-Equation 1 1
14:13, 7 September 2016 Newell-Article 1-Equation 2r.jpg (file) 11 KB Chuck Newell- Article 2 - Equation 2 1
14:09, 7 September 2016 Newell-Article 1-Equation 1r.jpg (file) 12 KB Chuck Newell - Article 1 - Equation 1 1
20:43, 6 September 2016 Newell-Article 1-Table2r.jpg (file) 103 KB Table 2. Mobile Porosity Estimates from Tracer Tests 1
20:38, 6 September 2016 Newell-Article 1-Table1r.jpg (file) 138 KB Table 1. Representative Values of Total Porosity (n), Effective Porosity (ne), and Hydraulic Conductivity (K) for Different Aquifer Materials 1
18:52, 2 September 2016 Newell-Article 1-Equation 2.jpg (file) 36 KB Since Darcy’s time, there has been a significant variation of Darcy’s Law which is used to calculate the actual velocity that the groundwater is moving, such as meters traveled per year. This quantity is called “interstitial velocity” or “see... 1
18:50, 2 September 2016 Newell-Article 1-Equation 1.jpg (file) 58 KB In unconsolidated geologic settings (gravel, sand, silt, and clay) and highly fractured systems, the rate of groundwater movement can be expressed using Darcy’s Law. This law is a fundamental mathematical relationship in the groundwater field and can... 1
18:41, 2 September 2016 Newell-Article 1-Fig4.JPG (file) 89 KB Figure 4. Difference between Darcy Velocity (also called Specific Discharge) and Seepage Velocity (also called Interstitial Velocity). 1
18:39, 2 September 2016 Newell-Article 1-Fig3..JPG (file) 51 KB Figure 3: Conceptual explanation of Darcy’s Law based on Darcy’s experiment. Adapted from course notes developed by Dr. R.J. Mitchell (Western Washington University). 1
18:37, 2 September 2016 Newell-Article 1-Fig2.jpg (file) 469 KB Figure 2. Hydraulic Conductivity of Selected Rocks (from Heath, 1983). 1
21:41, 1 September 2016 Heath-1983-Basic groundwater hydrology water supply paper.pdf (file) 13.1 MB Heath, R.C., 1983. Basic ground-water hydrology, U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2220, 86p. 1
20:04, 30 August 2016 Krug-Article 1. Table1 perchlorate.PNG (file) 31 KB Table 1. Perchlorate Physical and Chemical Properties 1
20:03, 30 August 2016 Krug-article 1. Fig2 Biodegradation Pathways.PNG (file) 232 KB Figure 2: Biodegradation Pathways for Perchlorate 1
20:00, 30 August 2016 Krug-Article 1. Fig1 perchlorate.jpg (file) 1.88 MB Figure 1: Perchlorate Releases and Drinking Water Detections 1
14:58, 29 August 2016 McCall Article 3 Figure 11.PNG (file) 159 KB Figure 11: OIP log with EC plotted on left, % area of fluorescence plotted on the right graph (shaded). Example of a captured image displaying fluorescence (mid-right) and analysis of the image used to determine % area of fluorescence below. Fuel pro... 1
14:57, 29 August 2016 McCall Article 3 Figure 10.PNG (file) 14 KB Figure 10: Schematic of the OIP Probe. 1
14:55, 29 August 2016 McCall Article 3 Figure 9.PNG (file) 34 KB Figure 9: An MIP log, l to r: EC log, XSD, PID and FID detector responses versus depth identifying presence and levels of VOC contamination. 1
14:53, 29 August 2016 McCall Article 3 Figure 8.PNG (file) 21 KB Figure 8: Schematic of MIP depicting principles of operation. 1
14:50, 29 August 2016 McCall Article 3 Figure 7.PNG (file) 75 KB Figure 7: An HPT log with EC on left, injection pressure in middle, and flow rate on right. Note good agreement between the EC and HPT pressure logs. Mostly coarse grained below 29 ft with 2 clay layers defined. See also Fig. 5. 1
14:46, 29 August 2016 McCall Article 3 Figure 6.PNG (file) 24 KB Figure 6: Schematic of an HPT probe. 1
21:14, 26 August 2016 McCall Article 3 Figure 5.PNG (file) 50 KB Figure 5: A typical EC log with rate of penetration (ROP) plotted on left and bulk formation EC on right. The decrease in EC and ROP at ~29ft indicates transition to coarser grained materials (sands). 1
21:13, 26 August 2016 McCall Article 3 Figure 4.PNG (file) 36 KB Figure 4: A Wenner array probe (top) and a dipole array built into an MIP probe. 1
21:12, 26 August 2016 McCall Article 3 Figure 3.PNG (file) 93 KB Figure 3: A CPTu log displaying l to r: lithologic graph based on log interpretation, tip resistance, sleeve friction, pore pressure and friction ratio. 1
21:11, 26 August 2016 McCall Article 3 Figure 2.PNG (file) 10 KB Figure 2: A CPT cone (left) and piezocone (right) with porous ring. 1
21:10, 26 August 2016 McCall Article 3 Figure 1.PNG (file) 58 KB Figure 1: General components of a DP logging system. 1
20:25, 26 August 2016 OI Analytical-2001-1656 appl USEPA Halogen XSDvsELCD.pdf (file) 145 KB OI Analytical, 2001. Using the Halogen Specific Detector (XSDTM) as an alternative to the ELCD in USEPA Methods: Presented at the 2001 Pittsburgh Conference on Analytical Chemistry and Applied Spectroscopy, New Orleans, LA 1
19:34, 19 August 2016 McCall Article 2. Figure 1.PNG (file) 39 KB Figure 1: Sampling sequence with an open-barrel, single-tube soil sampling system. The sample barrel is advanced through the open borehole to succeeding depths. 1
18:15, 18 August 2016 McCall Article 2. Figure 7.PNG (file) 24 KB Figure 7: Components of a screened implant system for long term monitoring of VOCs in soil gas. 1
18:13, 18 August 2016 McCall Article 2. Figure 6.PNG (file) 24 KB Figure 6: Components of a direct push soil gas sampling tool string for active soil gas sampling. 1
18:12, 18 August 2016 McCall Article 2. Figure 5.PNG (file) 54 KB Figure 5: Structure of a prepacked screen used to build monitoring wells with DP methods. 1
18:10, 18 August 2016 McCall Article 2. Figure 4.PNG (file) 43 KB Figure 4: A DP installed monitoring well constructed with prepacked well screens. 1
18:04, 18 August 2016 McCall Article 2. Figure 3.PNG (file) 49 KB Figure 3: Steps in the operation of a dual-tube groundwater sampler 1
18:04, 18 August 2016 McCall Article 2. Figure 2.PNG (file) 51 KB Figure 2: The outer casing of the dual-tube system remains in place to control the bore hole as the inner rod is used to trip out the sample barrel with soil core. 1
20:32, 11 August 2016 McCall-Article 1-Figure 5.PNG (file) 24 KB Figure 5: Top-down materials injection with a pressure activated probe. 1
20:30, 11 August 2016 McCall-Article 1-Figure 4.PNG (file) 13 KB Figure 4: Bottom-up tremie grouting through a tool string. 1
20:26, 11 August 2016 McCall-Article 1-Figure 3.PNG (file) 32 KB Figure 3: Schematic of the Optical Image Profiler (OIP) that uses an ultraviolet light emitting diode (UV LED) and CMOS camera to induce and capture images of petroleum fuel fluorescence through a sapphire window. 1
20:21, 11 August 2016 McCall-Article 1-Figure 2.PNG (file) 315 KB Figure 2: Monitoring water quality parameters while purging groundwater from a single-tube, protected screen, discrete interval sampler 1
20:19, 11 August 2016 McCall-Article 1-Figure 1.PNG (file) 342 KB Figure 1: A track mounted DP machine set up for collection of soil and groundwater samples. The tool rack is transported to the sample location on the stabilizer bar at the back of the unit 1
20:45, 4 August 2016 USEPA-1999-Understanding variation in partition coefficient, Kd values-Vol 1.pdf (file) 3.61 MB United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1999. Understanding variation in partition coefficient, Kd, values, Volume 1 – The Kd model, methods of measurement, and application of chemical reaction codes. EPA 402-R-99-004A 1
20:17, 4 August 2016 USEPA-2007-MNA of Inorganic Contaminants in GW, Vol 1 Technical Basis for Assessment.pdf (file) 2.16 MB U.S.E.P.A., 2007. Monitored Natural Attenuation of Inorganic Contaminants in Groundwater, Volume 1 Technical Basis for Assessment, Edited by R.G. Ford, R.T. Wilkin, and R.W. Puls. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/R-07/139. 1
19:38, 4 August 2016 Palmisano-2003 Bioremed. of Metals and Radionuclides What it is and How it Works.pdf (file) 2.75 MB Palmisano, A. and Hazen, T., 2003. Bioremediation of metals and radionuclides: What it is and how it works. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. 1
16:31, 4 August 2016 Wilkin-2007-Metal Attenuation Processes at Mining Sites.pdf (file) 475 KB Wilkin, R.T., 2007. Metal Attenuation Processes at Mining Sites. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/R-07/092 1
First pagePrevious pageNext pageLast page