Difference between revisions of "Injection Techniques - Viscosity Modification"

From Enviro Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (1 revision imported)
 
(12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
'''Related Article(s):'''
 
'''Related Article(s):'''
 +
*[[Chlorinated Solvents]]
 
*[[Injection Techniques for Liquid Amendments]]
 
*[[Injection Techniques for Liquid Amendments]]
 
*[[Zerovalent Iron (ZVI) (Chemical Reduction - ISCR)]]
 
*[[Zerovalent Iron (ZVI) (Chemical Reduction - ISCR)]]
−
*[[Chlorinated Solvents]]
 
  
  
−
'''CONTRIBUTOR(S):''' [[Michael Truex]]
+
'''Contributor(s):''' [[Michael Truex]]
  
  
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
==Introduction==
 
==Introduction==
−
The success of in situ [[Remediation Technologies | remediation technologies]] rely on the effective delivery and distribution of the remedial amendments (e.g., electron donors, oxidants, microorganisms, etc.) to the target zones. Formation heterogeneity (e.g., differences in [[wikipedia: Permeability (earth sciences) | permeability]]) is a common challenge due to preferential flow during the injection, causing a non-uniform distribution of injected amendments. When particulates are used as remedial amendments (e.g., [[Zerovalent Iron (ZVI) (Chemical Reduction - ISCR) | zero valent iron [ZVI]]] or slow-release amendments), gravitational settling of the particles within the sediment pores can limit distribution. [[wikipedia: Viscosity | Viscosity]] modifiers can be added to injection solutions to improve amendment distribution in the subsurface and can help maintain particles in suspension and improve the radial distance of particle injection. Viscosity modification can also be used to slow the migration of slow-release amendments out of the target treatment zone.  
+
The success of in situ [[Remediation Technologies | remediation technologies]] rely on the effective delivery and distribution of the remedial amendments (e.g., electron donors, oxidants, microorganisms, etc.) to the target zones. Formation heterogeneity (e.g., differences in [[wikipedia: Permeability (earth sciences) | permeability]]) is a common challenge due to preferential flow during the injection, causing a non-uniform distribution of injected amendments. When particulates are used as remedial amendments (e.g., [[Zerovalent Iron (ZVI) (Chemical Reduction - ISCR) | zero valent iron (ZVI)]] or slow-release amendments), gravitational settling of the particles within the sediment pores can limit distribution. [[wikipedia: Viscosity | Viscosity]] modifiers can be added to injection solutions to improve amendment distribution in the subsurface and can help maintain particles in suspension and improve the radial distance of particle injection. Viscosity modification can also be used to slow the migration of slow-release amendments out of the target treatment zone.  
  
 
==Shear-Thinning Fluid For Heterogeneous Subsurface Environments==
 
==Shear-Thinning Fluid For Heterogeneous Subsurface Environments==

Latest revision as of 02:12, 28 April 2022

Viscosity modifiers can be added to injection solutions to improve amendment distribution in the subsurface. Shear-thinning fluids of polymer solutions have variable viscosity, helping facilitate a more uniform distribution of injected amendments to different permeability zones while maintaining low injection pressure. Specifically for particulate amendments, viscosity modifiers can help maintain particles in suspension and improve the radial distance of particle injection. Colloidal silica also has shear-thinning properties and can be used to deliver slow-release amendments to the subsurface.

Related Article(s):


Contributor(s): Michael Truex


Key Resource(s):

Introduction

The success of in situ remediation technologies rely on the effective delivery and distribution of the remedial amendments (e.g., electron donors, oxidants, microorganisms, etc.) to the target zones. Formation heterogeneity (e.g., differences in permeability) is a common challenge due to preferential flow during the injection, causing a non-uniform distribution of injected amendments. When particulates are used as remedial amendments (e.g., zero valent iron (ZVI) or slow-release amendments), gravitational settling of the particles within the sediment pores can limit distribution. Viscosity modifiers can be added to injection solutions to improve amendment distribution in the subsurface and can help maintain particles in suspension and improve the radial distance of particle injection. Viscosity modification can also be used to slow the migration of slow-release amendments out of the target treatment zone.

Shear-Thinning Fluid For Heterogeneous Subsurface Environments

Figure 1. Xanthan gum concentration influence on fluid viscosity and rheology for several xanthan concentrations. All solutions were made in de-ionized water.

Soluble organic polymers, such as xanthan gum, can be added to water to form shear-thinning fluids that have a high viscosity at low shear rates (Fig. 1[3]). However, the fluid viscosity declines as the shear rate increases during mixing or when the fluid flows through porous media. This effect keeps injection pressure low while providing the benefits of higher viscosity fluids. These shear-thinning fluids can be used to more uniformly distribute remedial amendments. When first injected into a heterogeneous formation with both higher and lower permeability (K) zones, the shear-thinning fluid preferentially migrates through the higher K zones. However as the fluid migrates radially out from an injection well, shear rates decline with increasing distance, and back pressure increases, forcing more of the shear-thinning fluid and remedial amendment into lower K zones. Use of shear thinning fluids improves the uniformity of amendment distribution around an injection well, for moderate contrasts in hydraulic conductivity of less than about 2 orders of magnitude[4][5][3][6][7][8][9][10][11][1][2][12][13][14]. In Figure 2, each panel shows the distribution of a high electrical conductivity injection solution (red/yellow shades) solutions for a baseline (no viscosity amendment) injection (left panel) and shear-thinning fluid (STF) injection (right panel) over the depth interval of the screen[9]. After the amendments are delivered to the target zones, the polymers are degraded and the viscosity of injected solution returns to that of groundwater[3]. Enhanced delivery and improved distribution uniformity for soluble bio-nutrients and oxidants have been reported in the literature[9][1][2]. Enhanced delivery of vegetable oil droplets using xanthan gum solution has been tested and promising results are documented[6].

Figure 2. Comparison of amendment distribution using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) images.

Increased Viscosity to Stabilize Particulate Suspensions

Micron-sized zero valent iron (mZVI) particles can be used to remediate a range of groundwater contaminants. Compared to nano zero valent iron (nZVI) particles, mZVI particles have longer life time and are easier and safer to handle during preparation. However, mZVI particles settle quickly in water, making the preparation of stable particle-in-water suspensions, injection, and distribution of the particles to the subsurface unpractical. To address this issue, polymers can be added to a mZVI-water suspension to significantly increase the fluid viscosity, slowing the sedimentation rate of the particles. With viscosity modification, the mZVI suspensions can be effectively prepared and injected into the subsurface to distribute mZVI to a distance from the injection well for use in site remediation. Xanthan gum, SlurryProTM, and guar gum are examples of polymers that have been used for mZVI stabilization[8][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Because these polymer solutions are shear thinning fluids, with injection-induced shear, the viscosity of the solutions is lower near the injection well, reducing injection pressure buildup[18].

Slow Release Amendment Placement

Remedial technologies intended to last for a long time and release the amendment at a slow rate are useful for some groundwater remediation sites. Solid phase permeable reactive barriers have been the conventional approach to place slow release amendment materials in a particular location in the subsurface. Installation of these barriers by trenching can be difficult for some sites (e.g., for deep sites). Aqueous colloidal silica suspensions have low viscosity initially; however, their viscosity increases with time and eventually they become gels. Under favorable geochemical conditions, these delayed gelation solutions allow time for injection and distribution into the desired location in the subsurface. This material can be used to prepare injectable amendment-laden silica suspensions. After injection to the target zones, the suspensions become gel and establish discrete slow release remediation sources in aquifer[21][22][23]. Aqueous silica suspensions also have shear thinning characteristics, facilitating their injection[21].

References

  1. ^ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Adamson, D., Newell, C., Truex, M., Zhong, L., 2014. Enhanced amendment delivery to low permeability zones for chlorinated solvent source area bioremediation. ER-200913
  2. ^ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Crimi, M., Silva, J.A.K., Palaia, T., 2013. Cooperative technology demonstration: polymer-enhanced subsurface delivery and distribution of permanganate. Final Technical Report. ESTCP Project ER-200912. ER-200912
  3. ^ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Zhong, L., Oostrom, M., Truex, M.J., Vermeul, V.R., Szecsody, J.E., 2013. Rheological behavior of xanthan gum solution related to shear thinning fluid delivery for subsurface remediation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 244, 160-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.11.028
  4. ^ Zhong, L., Oostrom, M., Wietsma, T.W., Covert, M.A., 2008. Enhanced remedial amendment delivery through fluid viscosity modifications: Experiments and numerical simulations. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 101(1), 29-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.07.007
  5. ^ Zhong, L., Szecsody, J., Oostrom, M., Truex, M., Shen, X., Li, X., 2011. Enhanced remedial amendment delivery to subsurface using shear thinning fluid and aqueous foam. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 191(1), 249-257. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.04.074
  6. ^ 6.0 6.1 Zhong, L., Truex, M.J., Kananizadeh, N., Li, Y., Lea, A.S., Yan, X., 2015. Delivery of vegetable oil suspensions in a shear thinning fluid for enhanced bioremediation. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 175, 17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2015.02.001
  7. ^ Truex, M.J., Macbeth, T.W., Vermeul, V.R., Fritz, B.G., Mendoza, D.P., Mackley, R.D., Wietsma, T.W., Sandberg, G., Powell, T., Powers, J., Pitre, E., 2011. Demonstration of combined zero-valent iron and electrical resistance heating for in situ trichloroethene remediation. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(12), 5346-5351. doi: 10.1021/es104266a
  8. ^ 8.0 8.1 Truex, M.J., Vermeul, V.R., Mendoza, D.P., Fritz, B.G., Mackley, R.D., Oostrom, M., Wietsma, T.W., Macbeth, T.W., 2011. Injection of zero‐valent iron into an unconfined aquifer using shear‐thinning fluids. Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation, 31(1), 50-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.2010.01319.x
  9. ^ 9.0 9.1 9.2 Truex, M.J., Vermeul, V.R., Adamson, D.T., Oostrom, M., Zhong, L., Mackley, R.D., Fritz, B.G., Horner, J.A., Johnson, T.C., Thomle, J.N., Newcomer, D.R., 2015. Field test of enhanced remedial amendment delivery using a shear‐thinning fluid. Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation, 35(3), 34-45. doi: 10.1111/gwmr.12101
  10. ^ Silva, J.A., Smith, M.M., Munakata-Marr, J., McCray, J.E., 2012. The effect of system variables on in situ sweep-efficiency improvements via viscosity modification. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 136, 117-130. doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2012.05.006
  11. ^ Silva, J.A., Liberatore, M., McCray, J.E., 2013. Characterization of bulk fluid and transport properties for simulating polymer-improved aquifer remediation. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 139(2), 149-159. doi.10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000616
  12. ^ Chokejaroenrat, C., Comfort, S., Sakulthaew, C., Dvorak, B., 2014. Improving the treatment of non-aqueous phase TCE in low permeability zones with permanganate. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 268, pp.177-184. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.01.007
  13. ^ Chokejaroenrat, C., Kananizadeh, N., Sakulthaew, C., Comfort, S., Li, Y., 2013. Improving the sweeping efficiency of permanganate into low permeable zones to treat TCE: experimental results and model development. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(22), 13031-13038. doi: 10.1021/es403150x
  14. ^ Kananizadeh, N., Chokejaroenrat, C., Li, Y., Comfort, S., 2015. Modeling improved ISCO treatment of low permeable zones via viscosity modification: Assessment of system variables. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 173, 25-37. doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2014.11.009
  15. ^ Oostrom, M., Wietsma, T.W., Covert, M.A., Vermeul, V.R., 2007. Zero‐valent iron emplacement in permeable porous media using polymer additions. Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation, 27(1), 122-130. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.2006.00130.x
  16. ^ Xue, D., Sethi, R., 2012. Viscoelastic gels of guar and xanthan gum mixtures provide long-term stabilization of iron micro-and nanoparticles. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 14(11), 1-14. doi 10.1007/s11051-012-1239-0
  17. ^ Velimirovic, M., Tosco, T., Uyttebroek, M., Luna, M., Gastone, F., De Boer, C., Klaas, N., Sapion, H., Eisenmann, H., Larsson, P.O., Braun, J., 2014. Field assessment of guar gum stabilized microscale zerovalent iron particles for in-situ remediation of 1,1,1-trichloroethane. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 164, 88-99. doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2014.05.009
  18. ^ 18.0 18.1 Gastone, F., Tosco, T., Sethi, R., 2014. Green stabilization of microscale iron particles using guar gum: bulk rheology, sedimentation rate and enzymatic degradation. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 421, 33-43. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2014.01.021
  19. ^ Gastone, F., Tosco, T., Sethi, R., 2014. Guar gum solutions for improved delivery of iron particles in porous media (Part 1): Porous medium rheology and guar gum-induced clogging. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 166, 23-33. doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2014.06.013
  20. ^ Orozco, A. F., Velimirovic, M., Tosco, T., Kemna, A., Sapion, H., Klaas, N., Sethi, R., Bastiaens, L., 2015. Monitoring the injection of microscale zerovalent iron particles for groundwater remediation by means of complex electrical conductivity imaging. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(9), 5593-5600. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00208
  21. ^ 21.0 21.1 Yang S., Oostrom M., Truex M., Li, G., Zhong, L. 2016. Slow release of permanganate from injectable fumed silica gel: rheological properties and release dynamics. Environmental Science Processes & Impacts, 18, 256–264. doi: 10.1039/c5em00559k
  22. ^ Lee, E.S., Olson, P.R., Gupta, N., Solpuker, U., Schwartz, F.W., Kim, Y., 2014. Permanganate gel (PG) for groundwater remediation: Compatibility, gelation, and release characteristics. Chemosphere, 97, 140-145. doi: 10.1016/ j.chemosphere.2013.11.008
  23. ^ Lee, E.S., Gupta, N., 2014. Development and characterization of colloidal silica-based slow-release permanganate gel (SRP-G): Laboratory investigations. Chemosphere, 109, 195-201. doi:10.1016/ j.chemosphere.2014.01.020

See Also

Retrieved from "https://www.enviro.wiki/index.php?title=Injection_Techniques_-_Viscosity_Modification&oldid=15922"