Difference between revisions of "Main Page"
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
<div id="mp-itn" style="padding:0.0em 0.5em;"> | <div id="mp-itn" style="padding:0.0em 0.5em;"> | ||
− | <slideshow sequence="random" transition="fade" refresh=" | + | <slideshow sequence="random" transition="fade" refresh="5000"> |
[[File:WH Picture1.JPG|thumb|center|x350px|link=Dispersion and Diffusion|Molecular diffusion slowly transports solutes into clay-rich, lower permeability zones]] | [[File:WH Picture1.JPG|thumb|center|x350px|link=Dispersion and Diffusion|Molecular diffusion slowly transports solutes into clay-rich, lower permeability zones]] | ||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
*[[Dispersion and Diffusion]] | *[[Dispersion and Diffusion]] | ||
*[[Metals and Metalloids - Mobility in Groundwater | Mobility of Metals and Metalloids]] | *[[Metals and Metalloids - Mobility in Groundwater | Mobility of Metals and Metalloids]] | ||
− | |||
*[[pH Buffering in Aquifers]] | *[[pH Buffering in Aquifers]] | ||
*[[Sorption of Organic Contaminants]] | *[[Sorption of Organic Contaminants]] | ||
Line 92: | Line 91: | ||
**[[Geophysical Methods - Case Studies | Case Studies]] | **[[Geophysical Methods - Case Studies | Case Studies]] | ||
*[[Groundwater Sampling - No-Purge/Passive]] | *[[Groundwater Sampling - No-Purge/Passive]] | ||
− | |||
*[[Long-Term Monitoring (LTM)|Long-Term Monitoring (LTM)]] | *[[Long-Term Monitoring (LTM)|Long-Term Monitoring (LTM)]] | ||
**[[Long-Term Monitoring (LTM) - Data Analysis | LTM Data Analysis]] | **[[Long-Term Monitoring (LTM) - Data Analysis | LTM Data Analysis]] | ||
Line 114: | Line 112: | ||
*[[In Situ Treatment of Contaminated Sediments with Activated Carbon]] | *[[In Situ Treatment of Contaminated Sediments with Activated Carbon]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | <u>'''[[Light Non-Aqueous Phase Liquids (LNAPLs)]]'''</u> | ||
+ | |||
+ | *[[LNAPL Conceptual Site Models]] | ||
+ | *[[LNAPL Remediation Technologies]] | ||
+ | *[[NAPL Mobility]] | ||
<u>'''[[Munitions Constituents]]'''</u> | <u>'''[[Munitions Constituents]]'''</u> | ||
Line 163: | Line 167: | ||
*[[Injection Techniques - Viscosity Modification]] | *[[Injection Techniques - Viscosity Modification]] | ||
*[[Landfarming]] | *[[Landfarming]] | ||
− | |||
*[[Metal and Metalloids - Remediation | Remediation of Metals and Metalloids]] | *[[Metal and Metalloids - Remediation | Remediation of Metals and Metalloids]] | ||
*[[Remediation Performance Assessment at Chlorinated Solvent Sites]] | *[[Remediation Performance Assessment at Chlorinated Solvent Sites]] | ||
Line 183: | Line 186: | ||
*[[N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA)]] | *[[N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA)]] | ||
*[[Perchlorate|Perchlorate]] | *[[Perchlorate|Perchlorate]] | ||
− | *[[Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) | + | *[[Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS)]] |
*[[Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHCs)]] | *[[Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHCs)]] | ||
*[[Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)]] | *[[Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)]] |
Revision as of 20:01, 17 September 2020
Peer Reviewed. Accessible. Written By Experts |
Your Environmental Information Gateway |
The goal of ENVIRO.wiki is to make scientific and engineering research results more accessible to environmental professionals, facilitating the permitting, design and implementation of environmental projects. Articles are written and edited by invited experts (see Contributors) to summarize current knowledge for the target audience on an array of topics, with cross-linked references to reports and technical literature. | See Table of Contents |
Featured article: Sustainable RemediationPer and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contained in Class B aqueous film-forming foams (AFFFs) are known to accumulate on wetted surfaces of many fire suppression systems after decades of exposure.
Fire suppression systems with potential PFAS impacts include fire fighting vehicles that carried AFFF and fixed suppression systems in buildings containing large amounts of flammable materials such as aircraft hangars. PFAS residue on the wetted surfaces of existing infrastructure can rebound into replacement PFAS-free firefighting formulations if not removed during the transition process. Simple surface rinsing with water and low-pressure washing has been proven to be inefficient for removal of surface bound PFAS from piping and tanks that contained fluorinated AFFF.In addition to proper methods for system cleaning to remove residual PFAS, transition to PFAS-free foam may also include consideration of compliance with state and federal regulations, selection of the replacement PFAS-free firefighting formulation, a cost benefit analysis for replacement of the system components versus cleaning, and clean out verification testing. Foam transition should be completed in a manner which minimizes the volume of waste generated as well as preventing any PFAS release into the environment. Companies are developing new methods to remove self-assembled PFAS bilayers from existing fire-fighting infrastructure so that it can be successfully transitioned to PFAS-free formulations. PFAS sampling techniques used to support firefighting formulation transition activities are consistent with conventional sampling techniques used in the environmental industry, but special consideration is made regarding high concentration PFAS materials, elevated detection levels, cross-contamination potential, precursor content, and matrix interferences. The analytical method selected should be appropriate for the regulatory requirements in the site area. |
Enviro Wiki Highlights |